ISVs, IT services companies and Internet service providers often include in their contracts disclaimers. The aim is clear: to reduce the financial impact of Non-compliance with commitments.
In these times of heightened competition among suppliers, the temptation to engage without the certainty of its promises.
A disclaimer does it all for free supplier rash?
Jurisprudence answers emphatically in the negative.
The court may in fact be deemed not written a disclaimer, thus depriving it of the desired effect.
To do this, simply calls it the non-compliance by the supplier of one of its contractual commitments as a breach of duty essential.
Such characterization thus produces serious consequences for the supplier.
The Commercial Chamber of the Supreme Court has reminded the Oracle Corporation by its ruling Feb. 13, 2007, now known as the counterparty: Faurecia.
In this case, the software company had not fulfilled its commitment to deliver the V12 version of its software in September 1999. She has not done before either. The Commercial Chamber ruled that, in the absence of force majeure, the failure of the delivery schedule by Oracle Corporation was breach of an essential obligation. It therefore refused the application of the disclaimer that the publisher intends to oppose his client.
The decision of the Court of Cassation can only be approved. She recalls that the finesse have contractual limitations and that suppliers are obliged by their commitments, regardless of the precautions taken by the drafters of contracts.
It contributes to the moralization of business life.
While the publishers' market focus, customers no longer have much choice to negotiate contract terms unilaterally drafted by suppliers ever more powerful.
The scope of the stop Faurecia is vast: the rule established by the Commercial Division can be applied very frequently in the computer services field, particularly in the presence of commitments of time, performance or system integration existing information.
It is still necessary that the supplier's failure relates to an obligation described as essential.
The challenge of this qualification is particularly important.
Customers will therefore be well advised to explain as often as possible the essential character of some of the commitments undertaken by suppliers.
However, what will happen in the absence of such a caution?
The great generality of the law allows Faurecia to consider, however, they remain protected because only ancillary obligations are intended to be covered by disclaimers.
This analysis is confirmed by a second etimportante decision of the Commercial Chamber of the Supreme Court, dated June 5, 2007 (Case No. 06-14382 extandable - intended for publication in the Annual Report 2007). Again is raised the requirement that the disclaimer may be waived as soon as the trigger for liability is a breach of an essential obligation.
The contract loses its function as part of risk management.
times thus become more difficult for software companies, software companies and internet service providers.
This difficulty is compounded by the recognition in French law the notion of "non-professional, especially posed by the Supreme Court March 15, 2005.
This opens the possibility for people benefit from legal protection in the field of unfair, since they can be described as "unprofessional." Such characterization is based assessment of the direct relationship between the contract and the customer's business.
In the absence of such a direct relationship, a client company can benefit from the elimination of unfair reducing the commitment of the supplier.
list of them is growing.
Thus, récentess recommendations of the Commission on unfair terms include the ability to request the removal clauses with the purpose or effect in any case exempt the professional from liability in case of default or late performance of his obligation to deliver.
Chatel Act of 3 January 2008 further strengthens the protection of non-professionals.
The combined effects of the legislature and most of the jurisprudence, the year 2008 is not under the best homes for the computer industry.